Ncert Solutions for Civics Ch-5 – Democratic Rights







Question 1.

Which of the following is not an instance of an exercise of a fundamental right?


a)Workers from Bihar go to Punjab to work on the farms

b)Christian missions set up a chain of missionary schools

c)Men and women government employees get the same salary

d)Parents’ property is inherited by their children

Answer: (d)


Question 2.

Which of the following freedoms is not available to an Indian citizen?


a)Freedom to criticise the government

b)Freedom to participate in armed revolution

c)Freedom to start a movement to change the government

d)Freedom to oppose the central values of the Constitution

Answer:(b)


Question 3.

 Which of the following rights is available under the Indian Constitution?

a)Right to work

b)Right to an adequate livelihood

c)Right to protect one’s culture

d)Right to privacy

Answer:(c)


Question 4.

Name the Fundamental Right under which each of the following rights falls:


a)Freedom to propagate one’s religion

b)Right to life

c)Abolition of untouchability

d)Ban on bonded labour

Answer:Right to Freedom of Religion

Right to Freedom

Right to Equality

Right against Exploitation


Question 5.

Which of these statements about the relationship between democracy and rights is more valid? Give reasons for your preference.


Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens.

Every country that gives rights to its citizens is a democracy.

Giving rights is good, but it is not necessary for a democracy.

Answer:Each equitable nation gives privileges to its residents, as the essential quality of being a popularity based nation is to zero in on its residents and work for their government assistance. Nonetheless, the country that gives freedoms to its residents could possibly be vote based.


Question 6.

Are there restrictions on the right to freedom justified? Give reasons


for your answer.


Indian citizens need permission to visit some border areas of the country for reasons of security.

Outsiders are not allowed to buy property in some areas to protect the interest of the local population.

The government bans the publication of a book that can go against the ruling party in the next elections.

Answer:Indeed, it is legitimate. Despite the fact that the option to go to any piece of the nation is a central right, there are a few sensible limitations. These limitations are applied to get the interests of various networks of the nation and furthermore to keep up with the rule of law.

Indeed, this is legitimate as the goal is to get the social and phonetic privileges of specific segments of the local area.

No, it isn't legitimate. It diminishes a singular's central right to opportunity, where he/she can offer his viewpoints. The right to speak freely of discourse and articulation engages individuals to display their contemplations.


Question 7.

Manoj went to a college to apply for admission into an MBA course. The clerk refused to take his application and said “You, the son of a sweeper, wish to be a manager! Has anyone done this job in your community? Go to the municipality office and apply for a sweeper’s position”. Which of Manoj’s fundamental rights are being violated in this instance? Spell these out in a letter from Manoj to the district collector.

Answer:Manoj's essential right to fairness has been abused. Right to equity gives the option to get work paying little mind to rank, orientation, religion. The other right that has been abused is the right to opportunity. This right presents opportunity or individual freedom for anybody to look for a task.


Question 8.

When Madhurima went to the property registration office, the exercises Registrar told her, “You can’t write your name as Madhurima Banerjee d/o A. K. Banerjee. You are married, you must give your husband’s name. Your husband’s surname is Rao. So your name should be changed to Madhurima Rao.” She did not agree. She said, “If my husband’s name has not changed after marriage, why should mine?” In your opinion who is right in this dispute? And why?

Answer:Madhurima is correct. The enlistment center is disregarding her right to opportunity. The topic of picking a last name of her better half's or her dad is absolutely Madhurima's tact. By demanding her to adjust to her significant other's last name, the enlistment center abused her entitlement to pick and her right to security.